Parliamentary Question: Share Financing

Issues Raised in Parliament

ANSWER TO PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION ON:
CONSUMER CREDIT

For Parliamentary Sitting on 25 Apr 2000


Questions:
Q3. To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether the recent new initiative by financial institutions in relation to share financing will lead to excessive credit exposure by investors.

Answer:

1. Share financing is an integral part of the securities market. Before March 15 this year, under the old T + 5 settlement system, investors often did not have to pay up until 12 days after their trades were executed. The contra buyer could sell on the fifth day after the initial purchase, and only pay the broker the difference between the purchase and sale prices after settlement of the contra sale, which was another six days later. In addition, brokers often extended informal credit, so that when the market entered a downswing some customers would default, exacerbating the problem of contra losses.

2. Now that we have shortened the settlement cycle to T + 3, contra trading has become less attractive. This may dampen market turnover. Brokers have responded by introducing new forms of financing for their clients, and reviving older forms. For example, at least one broker is giving its preferred clients up to 14 days interest free credit.

3. Where securities firms are concerned, the Singapore Exchange requires its members to impose an initial margin requirement of at least 50%. This means that if an investor buys $2,000 worth of securities, he must pay the first $1,000 upfront. SGX rules also require the broker to make a margin call when the value of the securities falls below $1,800. If the investor is unable to meet the call, the broker will sell the securities and liquidate the position.

4. These margin requirements have helped to keep our stockbroking firms healthy and not over-exposed to risk. They should adequately protect the firms should the market turn down. From the macro perspective, the rules have also prevented excessive leverage in the stock market, much like MAS' rules on property financing.

5. However, these margin requirements do not currently apply to banks, or to other lenders that are not members of the SGX. Hence UOB could recently offer customers 100% share financing up to six times their monthly salary, so that they can buy shares without putting up any money upfront.

6. Our banks are well capitalised. Margin loans form only a small percentage of their total loan portfolio. MAS is therefore not worried that the banks will become overexposed to the stock market. However, MAS is concerned that over-generous margin loans may create froth in the stock market, and increase market volatility. They may also lead to an excessive expansion of consumer borrowing, and tempt individuals to speculate in shares beyond the limits of what they can afford.

7. The US Federal Reserve Board imposes margin require-ments on brokers, banks and non-bank intermediaries. All providers of share financing are required to impose an initial margin requirement of at least 50%. There is thus a level playing field, unlike in Singa-pore. The US FRB requires investors to pay $1,000 upfront for $2,000 worth of securities. The exchanges also require margin calls to be made when the value of the securities falls below $1,333. This is more liberal than our threshold of $1,800, but in practice many American broker-dealers maintain stricter internal policies on initial margin requirements as well as margin calls.

8. As the US stock market has risen, margin debt has grown sharply. There have been calls on the FRB to raise the margin require-ment, especially after the recent volatility in US equity prices. The FRB has not agreed to do so. Its position is that the present requirements are adequate, but it is continuing to monitor the situation. Other commentators have observed that margin financing is only one form of leverage in the stock market, and is still only a small percentage of total market capitalisation.

9. MAS is reviewing whether to extend limits on margin financing across the broad spectrum of margin providers, and whether our present requirements provide the proper balance in our markets.

Last Modified on 26/11/2016