MAS Staff Paper No. 28, Feb 2004

Why Has There Been Less Financial Integration In Asia Than In Europe?

By Professor Barry Eichengreen, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. This paper was prepared while Professor Eichengreen was visiting the Economic Policy Department, MAS, in January 2004.

Abstract

This paper asks why there is less financial integration in Asia than in Europe, taking as a case study the cross-border lending and investment activities of national banking systems. Our results suggest that different levels of economic development in Asia and Europe, along with other differences in regional circumstance that are largely predetermined from the point of view of policy (distance between countries, whether they share a common language, and whether they share a land border), explain a good deal of the difference in financial integration between the two regions. The rest of the gap is explained by policy variables. Evidence that finance follows trade suggests that Asia is less financially integrated than Europe because it has done less to promote the growth of intra-regional trade. Our results also suggest that controls on capital account transactions can have a lingering effect on the volume of cross-border claims and that their shadow is longest where those controls were maintained for the greatest number of years. The underdevelopment of financial markets and institutions in some potential lending countries also appears to be an impediment to financial integration in the region.

This paper can be downloaded in PDF format (PDF, 88.5KB)

and can be viewed and printed with Adobe's Acrobat^(TM) Reader