Why Has There Been Less Financial Integration In Asia Than In Europe?
Abstract
This paper asks why there is less financial integration in Asia than in Europe, taking as a case study the cross-border lending and investment activities of national banking systems. Our results suggest that different levels of economic development in Asia and Europe, along with other differences in regional circumstance that are largely predetermined from the point of view of policy (distance between countries, whether they share a common language, and whether they share a land border), explain a good deal of the difference in financial integration between the two regions. The rest of the gap is explained by policy variables. Evidence that finance follows trade suggests that Asia is less financially integrated than Europe because it has done less to promote the growth of intra-regional trade. Our results also suggest that controls on capital account transactions can have a lingering effect on the volume of cross-border claims and that their shadow is longest where those controls were maintained for the greatest number of years. The underdevelopment of financial markets and institutions in some potential lending countries also appears to be an impediment to financial integration in the region.
Related Publications
-
Staff PapersPublished Date: 11 February 2020
Cyber Risk Surveillance: A Case Study of Singapore
MAS Staff Paper No. 57, February 2020 - By Joseph Goh, Heedon Kang, Zhi Xing Koh, Jin Way Lim, Cheng Wei Ng, Galen Sher, and Chris Yao
-
Staff PapersPublished Date: 07 November 2019
Effects of Dark Trading on Liquidity of Singapore Equity Market
MAS Staff Paper No. 56, November 2019 - By Chioh Wenn Sheng, Chua Bing Kiat, Andrew Ang, Fan Jia Rong and Brandon Sim
-
Staff PapersPublished Date: 31 January 2017
Empirical Evidence on “Systemic as a Herd”: The Case of Japanese Regional Banks
MAS Staff Paper No. 55, January 2017 - By Naohisa Hirakata, Yosuke Kido, and Jie Liang Thum